<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger trial in Berlin: Entenmann vs. Bartels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://larko.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/blogger-trial-in-berlin-entenmann-vs-bartels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://larko.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/blogger-trial-in-berlin-entenmann-vs-bartels/</link>
	<description>My voice in the Web - about anything and everything, sometimes even nothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:14:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More shameless remarks by Larko &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A web of his own</title>
		<link>http://larko.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/blogger-trial-in-berlin-entenmann-vs-bartels/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>More shameless remarks by Larko &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A web of his own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 04:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://larko.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/blogger-trial-in-berlin-entenmann-vs-bartels/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>[...] Also about a month ago, Jens Knoblich in Strausberg published this post in his blog Krambox. He quoted Callboy Torsten&#8217;s announcement that any undesired link to his site would be sued for 250 euros a day. Jens was referring to the court ruling in the case Wilhelm Entenmann vs. Marcel Bartels where the court basically threw out Mr. Entenmann&#8217;s lawsuite that seeked to ban Marcel from linking to his site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also about a month ago, Jens Knoblich in Strausberg published this post in his blog Krambox. He quoted Callboy Torsten&#8217;s announcement that any undesired link to his site would be sued for 250 euros a day. Jens was referring to the court ruling in the case Wilhelm Entenmann vs. Marcel Bartels where the court basically threw out Mr. Entenmann&#8217;s lawsuite that seeked to ban Marcel from linking to his site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larko</title>
		<link>http://larko.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/blogger-trial-in-berlin-entenmann-vs-bartels/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Larko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://larko.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/blogger-trial-in-berlin-entenmann-vs-bartels/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Blogger, I can asure you that Marcel is a decent young man like yourself. ;-)

As for the rest, since it goes a bit above this topic, I am going to reply in private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogger, I can asure you that Marcel is a decent young man like yourself. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for the rest, since it goes a bit above this topic, I am going to reply in private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogger</title>
		<link>http://larko.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/blogger-trial-in-berlin-entenmann-vs-bartels/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://larko.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/blogger-trial-in-berlin-entenmann-vs-bartels/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>yes, one has to see history of their relationship. Laws about cyberspace or atleast public&#039;s knowledge about them is not too extensive. Unless marcel was criminal or something, or was somehow causing loss of business to the other guy its difficult to understand why that guy filed a case.

Regardin the post you promised, i know you haven&#039;t forgotten. I wasn&#039;t complaining, only wondering. And i&#039;m in no hurry. Of course you have to have a context to put it into. :-) and spending time on internet was a compliment :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, one has to see history of their relationship. Laws about cyberspace or atleast public&#8217;s knowledge about them is not too extensive. Unless marcel was criminal or something, or was somehow causing loss of business to the other guy its difficult to understand why that guy filed a case.</p>
<p>Regardin the post you promised, i know you haven&#8217;t forgotten. I wasn&#8217;t complaining, only wondering. And i&#8217;m in no hurry. Of course you have to have a context to put it into. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  and spending time on internet was a compliment <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
