No invasion by land, please
Tuesday, July 25, 2006 at 23:41 | Posted in Denmark | 2 CommentsBerlingske Tidende writes that Denmark would be unable to send land troops to a possible peace keeping force in Lebanon because the Danish armed forces have not enough military personnel. There are currently Danish troops in Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan and a mission to Sudan is being prepared. Denmark would, however, manage to send out a naval vessel to patrol the Lebanese coast.
Does this mean that a possible enemy is kindly requested to invade Denmark by sea rather than by land?
Linking in a foreign language
Tuesday, July 25, 2006 at 17:47 | Posted in Blogosphere, hyperlink, languages | 4 CommentsIt turns out that I have unintentionally managed to cause some confusion by doing something as innocent as linking to a blog. The confusion was based on the fact that I was linking from a post written in Finnish to a post written in German. My Finnish post was in one of my blogs that is specialized on topics around work and the linked blog was in Udo Vetter’s law blog.
Mr. Vetter wrote a short post about somebody who was on a sick leave but was nevertheless summoned by his employer to appear in the office for a career prospect discussion. He had a clause in his contract that banned use of alcohol during working hours. When the man appeared for the discussion, two persons showed up and breathalized him. He was subsequently fired because the breath test showed 0,2 promille of alcohol in his blood.
The topic of alcohol and employment is interesting per se. In this case it appeared that the career discussion was used as an excuse to get rid of the employee which also made it interesting in context of a work related blog. So I wrote a summary (not a word for word translation) of the original post and linked to it.
Udo Vetter wrote yesterday that he had a funny trackback of which he understood just one word: alcohol. This prompted a number of comments both in his blog and mine. One of them, written by Jossi, even managed to reproduce a translation back to German that essentially matches with the original post.
An anonymous comment in my blog asks me this question:
Did it ever occur to you that setting trackbacks to foreign-language blogs might be considered impolite if you don’t provide a translation of your entry in the other blog’s language and/or English?
That is indeed an interesting question. In this particular case it would have practically meant that I had to copy and paste the original post to my blog which I did not think was a good idea as I was linking to it. How polite would that have been?
I do usually make a post in my English blog when linking to a blog in a language other than that of the blog. I do not remember why I failed to post this one in English. The time stamp of my post shows that it was written at 3.47 a.m. local time which would suggest that I might have gone to bed right after posting.
Baring in mind that I currently blog in four languages and could write up to 20 posts on a busy day, I sometimes do not even remember which topic I have covered in which blog. But the general rule is that I make a post in English of whatever I find in German blogs. By the way, those are a good source of interesting material.
But the question remains: is it impolite to link in a foreign language? I sometimes get linked to in a language that I do not even recognize, much less understand. I have mostly managed to somehow figure out what they post about but it is not such a big deal for me. If somebody thinks that I have written something that is worth refering to, I have nothing against that it is shared to people who do not understand the language I was blogging in.
I have also seen lots of posts in German blogs refering and linking to something that was written in another language, mostly English. But I have never seen a post reproduced in English. Which brings up the question if there are not two different standards of politeness.
English is of course the universal language of the Internet but it would be a shame if the web was all English. That would eventually mean that the smaller languages would die out. Of the European languages, German, French, Spanish and Italian are big enough to survive but langauges like Finnish and Estonian would be reduced to something only spoken on Sundays if there was no web content in those languages. But the smaller nations also need to interact with others which is why it is necessary to refer to web material in other languages.
Thank you, Mauri!
Tuesday, July 25, 2006 at 15:28 | Posted in eu | 2 CommentsTags: alzheimer's, stem cell
As I wrote on Saturday, the German research minister Annette Schavan wrote last week to her EU colleagues in favor of banning EU funding for embryonic stem cell research. The Finnish newspaper Helsingin Sanomat writes that Mr. Mauri Pekkarinen, the Finnish Minister of Industry and Commerce, has managed to convince Mrs. Schavan and a number of other EU ministers to allow EU funding for stem cell research. Opposition of Poland and Malta was not sufficient to block the funding.
The ministers approved a 55 billion € EU research programme for seven years in their meeting in Brussels. The programme includes funding for stem cell research projects for 30 million €. It is of course not much but it is a start and a sign of hope in the fight against Alzheimer’s.
To be quite honest, I have hitherto not had much respect for Mr. Pekkarinen. He is notorious for using his ministerial position for obtaining funds for questionable projects in his own constituency. But this time he made a good job and should be proud of his performance.
Thanks, minister!
Not worth insulting
Tuesday, July 25, 2006 at 14:03 | Posted in Uncategorized | 2 CommentsTags: kim jong-il, north korea
AFP reports that the North Korean news agency KCNA has delivered a series of insults addressed to the US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice:
“It was none other than Rice who let loose a spate of such piffle over the launch of a few missiles as part of military training to cope with the US reckless moves for aggression and war,” KCNA said.
“This cannot be construed otherwise than an outburst made by a political imbecile.”
The North Korean government and their dictator Kim Jong-Il may call me even an idiot if it makes them feel better. But a government that is unable to feed their own people and has to rely on international food aid and dispite that keeps developing ballistic missiles should perhaps be a bit more cautious about their way of characterizing others.
A government like that does not even deserve to be insulted.
Sunrise
Monday, July 24, 2006 at 18:48 | Posted in entertainment, Not serious | Leave a commentI did another one of those less than serious web tests. As if I had nothing more urgent and important to do. But everybody deserves a break every now and then. And that kind of tests are just entertainment. Thank you, Punane Hanrahan, for distracting my thoughts away from work!
Most of the result is pretty accurate, much to my surprise. Just the part about cooking for my friends is bull. I do like to cook but my best friends are those whom I do not need to see in person.
One thing I was unable to figure out. Why do they think that this description should be called sunrise? I usually go to bed by sunrise. Maybe they think that my life is in bed.
By the way, Hanrahan is a friend I do not see too often. That is why those rare occasions are a pleasure.
Anyway, here goes:
| You Are Sunrise |
You enjoy living a slow, fulfilling life. You enjoy living every moment, no matter how ordinary.You are a person of reflection and meditation. You start and end every day by looking inward. Caring and giving, you enjoy making people happy. You’re often cooking for friends or buying them gifts. All in all, you know how to love life for what it is – not for how it should be. |
Family reunion in court
Monday, July 24, 2006 at 7:28 | Posted in censorship, Freedom of speech, Germany, internet, Legal | 2 CommentsIf you happen to be anywhere near Heilbronn in Germany on Wednesday 26th July 2006, you may want to visit the public gallery of the 6th Civil Chamber of the local court, Wilhelmstrasse 8, at 11 o’clock in the morning. Chances are that you would see a good piece of entertainment as members (father, son and daughter) of the stinking rich Fischer family meet up to discuss whether or not the daughter, Mrs. Margot Fischer-Weber, has used expressions like sharks, pig and wolf about her father Artur Fischer and her brother Klaus Fischer.
The lawsuite (page 1 and 2) seeks a court order that would ban Mrs. Fischer-Weber to use such expressions in public. She would also be forbidden to present her father and brother as idiots. In addition to that, the court will hear arguments about a real estate transaction and circumstances under which Mrs. Fischer-Weber signed a notarial document giving up her inheritance rights to the family assets.
The case was supposed to be heard on Thursday 20th July but was postponed by the presiding judge Hartmann because Klaus Fischer could not make it then. Judge Hartman wrote in the original summon that Mrs. Fischer-Weber’s web site title “Sharks and other Fis(c)h(er)” is questionable to motivate a court order. The judge also noted that caricatures featuring a pig, a wolf and a fox do not seem to suggest to any particular persons.
This may indicate that at least that part of the lawsuite will have a slim chance of success. The stakes are nevertheless very high. The suite seeks a fine of 250.000 € or an imprisonment of up to six months in case Mrs. Fischer-Weber should violate a possible court order.
Marcel Bartels makes two good points in his blog. The most certain way to draw attention to any web site would be suing the owner of the site to get it off line. The case has already been covered by several German blogs that would hardly have paid much notice to www.fischerfratze.de without this lawsuite.
Marcel’s second point is a good question. Whom would the Fischer family sue if the site were to appear anonymously in a server outside German jurisdiction? As the recent developments in India have demonstrated, any attempt to censor the Internet is bound to bring a lot of bad publicity and very little success.
A glimpse of hope against Alzheimer’s
Sunday, July 23, 2006 at 4:32 | Posted in health | 1 CommentTags: alzheimer's
While George W Bush vetoed the law that would have boosted the most efficient line of research to fight Alzheimer’s disease, other parallel methods of an early diagnosis are being developed. The BBC reports about a simple eye test which could be used to detect early dementia. It is similar to the tests that are used to diagnosis of high blood pressure and diabetes.
The test, developed by a team led by Dr Lee Goldstein, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, uses a non-invasive laser to study the lens of the eye.
It checks for deposits of beta-amyloid – the protein found in the brains of those with Alzheimer’s disease.
But this does by no means suggest that the problem would have been solved:
Professor Clive Ballard, of The Alzheimer’s Society, said: “This exciting study uses a new imaging technique which has enormous potential as a relatively inexpensive and non-evasive way to chart the growth of amyloid, the protein at the core of the plaques which develop in the brain in a person with dementia.
“But we are long way from eye scans being regularly used to diagnosis someone with dementia.
“More research is needed to show exactly how the amount of protein in the eye relates to development of dementia.”
Stem cell research is needed as much as ever which is why I hope that the US voters will eventually release that line of research for the benefit of the millions of people all around the World who are likely to get hit by Alzheimer’s the next 20-30 years.
Indian blog curtain stays down dispite promises
Saturday, July 22, 2006 at 14:31 | Posted in Bloggers' rights, Blogosphere, censorship, India, internet, Web tools | 1 CommentRediff news wrote for more than 48 hours ago that the block against Blogspot, Typepad and Geocities would be lifted by the Indian government within 48 hours. The article suggests that the government would have wanted to block just 17 specified blogs rather than whole domains and the extent of the block would be a result of ISP’s going too far because of a technological error. Error or not, the block seems to be continuing well over 48 hours after the article was published.
A list of the 17 banned sites is included in the Rediff article and has been published elsewhere. Even a fax copy of the official document has been posted by Peter Griffin in the Google group BloggersCollective.
Among the officially censored sites are this site for volunteer work, some American right wing blogs and this blog that seems to be empty. That is hardly very subversive stuff for the Indian government.
The New York Times has received a letter from the Indian Consulate General in New York. It says that the government wanted to block
“two impertinent pages” rife with material considered to be “extremely derogatory references to Islam.”
Posts in the ISP watch list thread in BloggersCollective indicate that access to Blogspot, Typepad and Geocities varies a lot between different ISP’s and different parts of India. In some cases the sites also seem to be coming and going.
I do not know what the Indian government hoped to achieve with their operation of censorship. Citing technical problems sounds like a bad plan B that was hastily put together to distract the focus off their bad judgement. As it looks now, the tools of friendship offered to the Indian bloggers by their friends in Pakistan are as useful as ever.
A week of reality
Saturday, July 22, 2006 at 11:50 | Posted in Bureaucracy, eu | Leave a commentTags: Business
Günter Verheugen, the Vice-President of the European Commission in charge of Enterprise and Industry, is sending 350 senior EU bureaucrats out to small and medium size businesses to get a week of “Enterprize Experience”, Jyllands-Posten writes. 50 senior civil servants should attend the programme by the end of this year and by 2009 all 350 bureaucrats in EU’s Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry should have had their week in the real life.
Political consultant Søren Friis of the Danish Trade and Service employers is going to help find Danish businesses to accomodate some of the bureaucrats.
The purpose of the programme is said to give the EU bureaucrats a chance to understand the real problems of the businesses. But what if they will find out that they are the problem?
Dangerous for the establishment
Saturday, July 22, 2006 at 10:39 | Posted in Blogosphere, Finland, information, internet, Media, TV | 5 CommentsKlein Report in Switzerland gives a summary of an article by Ursula Stalder published in “NZZ am Sonntag”. The author notes that many businesses are concerned about the anonymity and unaccountability of bloggers. Blogs are referred to as the loo wall of the Internet. Klein Report wonders if there might be a weblog legislation of some sort being prepared behind the scenes.
Sven Scholz in Germany concludes that the concerned businesses may in fact be concerned for their monopoly of information being broken. Sven points out that this has in fact happened a long time ago. I could not agree more.
I wrote three weeks ago that for 20 years ago I could not even dream of the kind of an unlimited access to information sources of my choice that I am enjoying today. Access to news was controlled by print media, radio and television. Now I have access to the same sources as they have and I can make the selections of my own.
The traditional media did not only control the selection of news published. They also decided which members of public were allowed to express their opinions and reach a wider audience. While this “loo wall” of mine is not read by far as many people as the big traditional publications, I have the chance to address far more people than I could imagine for 20 years ago.
So the establishment is worried. They are worried because they have lost the control of information. And they are worried because freedom of speech is no longer just something theoretical but something that actually exists and is occasionally excerised by ordinary people in an unforseeable and uncontrollable way.
But there is more to come. In Finland the analogue TV transmissions are going to be discontinued from the end of August 2007. Finns are expected to buy either a converter or a digital TV set to be able to receive the digital transmissions.
The public broadcaster YLE 24 reported a week ago that so far only half of the households are able to receive digital TV. The sales of digi TV equipment should double from the present level if everybody is to get the box by deadline. One million households are presently unprepared for the era of digital TV.
Hitherto it has been taken for granted that everybody does indeed buy the digi box, cheapest of which are in the price range of 50 €. The more sophisticated receivers would cost several hundred euros but 50 € is something that everybody is expected to invest in a continued access to entertainment and information controlled by the establishment. I wonder why.
I hardly watch any TV at all as it is. I see no reason to put up at least 50 € in order to have access to something that I do not need to use. I do not need it because all I need is in the Web.
The establishment is probably counting for a part of the old folks to be dropped out. They are even planning to organize special networks to “assist” the senior citizens to go digital. But I am not sure if they realize that it is not just the old folks they should be worried about.
If people in my age and especially people who are younger than I am are not going to buy the box, the establishment will not only loose the control over the info we receive and submit. They will also have to recognize that we do not even bother to listen what they have to say. And that may turn out to be dangerous for the establishment.
Never too much beer
Saturday, July 22, 2006 at 8:33 | Posted in beer, Not serious, Personal | 4 CommentsChristian in Vienna notes that the human being is an unhappy creature. It is always either too hot or too cold, too dry or too wet, too bright or too dark, too quiet or too noisy.
While I agree with Christian, I must point out that most humans that I know are consistent on one point: there is never too much beer.

Fundamentalist Schavan messes with stem cells
Saturday, July 22, 2006 at 7:40 | Posted in eu, Germany | 1 CommentTags: stem cell
As if it was not enough of bad news that the US president George W Bush vetoed the stem cell research bill, the Guardian now writes that the German research minister Annette Schavan has written to her EU colleagues pressing for a ban of EU funding for embryonic stem cell research. The European Parliament last month voted to allow the funding and presiding Finland has drafted a ministerial decision accordingly. According to Guardian, Germany is being backed by the usual suspects within EU, i.e. Poland, Austria, Slovakia, Luxembourg, Malta and Slovenia.
I wonder if those in Germany who voted for the social democrats wanted their party to be a partner in a coalition that is copying the christian fundamentalist policies of George W Bush and trying to impose it as a part of EU standards. The good people in the constituency of Ulm/Alb-Donau are within their rights to elect whoever they want to the German parliament but they could perhaps instruct their MP to stop messing with stem cell research.
I can hardly wait for Farlion to take over the German government.
No smoking in university
Saturday, July 22, 2006 at 4:15 | Posted in Denmark, health, smoking | 4 CommentsDanish universities are introducing smoking bans within campus buildings, Berlingske Tidende writes. Copenhagen Business School was the first to insist on outdoors only puffing from 1st July, followed by Roskilde University as from 1st August and University of Copenhagen 1st September. Aalborg University is expected to follow suite soon while University of Southern Denmark and University of Aarhus have banned smoking in public areas indoors.
Looks like Denmark does not want smokers to aquire a higher education. Which in turn is likely to produce further restrictions on smoking. I wonder what is happening to the famous Danish hygge.
Indonesian journalist faces trial
Saturday, July 22, 2006 at 2:16 | Posted in Journalism, Press freedom | 2 CommentsTags: indonesia
Teguh Santosa, chief editor of Rakyat Merdeka Online was released from prison in Jakarta, Indonesia after a detention of 24 hours, AFP reports. Mr. Santosa faces a trial for “inciting animosity and hatred” against a religious group which could bring him a prison sentence of up to five years. In February he published the Mohammed cartoons.
Santosa, quoted by the Koran Tempo newspaper on Friday, said he was only trying to give readers a complete story on the controversial cartoons.
“It was in accordance with my job as a journalist,” he reportedly said.
The International Federation of Journalists earlier demanded the release of Mr. Santosa:
“Detaining an editor for doing his job, particularly when he has clearly addressed the complaints of his readers, is deplorable and totally inexcusable,” IFJ President Christopher Warren said.
The Rakyat Merdeka Online removed the cartoons from its web site after receiving a number of complaints from their readers and published an apology to anybody they may have offended.
What do they pay for?
Friday, July 21, 2006 at 2:23 | Posted in google, internet, Personal | Leave a commentAFP reports that Google’s second-quarter earnings have more than doubled. The big G made a profit of 721 million US dollars for April-June this year compared to 343 million dollars the same quarter last year.
Revenue surged 78 percent to 2.46 billion dollars in the quarter as Google entrenched its dominance of Internet searches and the online advertisers they attract.
“Google grew at an impressive pace during a seasonally slower quarter,” company chief executive Eric Schmidt said in a statement.
Apart from the search engine, I use a range of Google services. My mail has gone to G from the very start of G-Mail. I had a Blogger account long before Blogger became a part of Google and I still use it. My calender is in G and Writeley opens my e-mail attatchements if the mail itself can not handle it. And these are just a few of the Google features that I use every day, often not even realizing that they are G.
Being the regular Google user that I am (a relatively happy one, I might add) I was wondering what exactly it is that those advertisers pay Google these huge sums of money for. For their ads to reach Google’s users? Please do not make me laugh!
I never pay attention to those “targeted ads”. I hardly even notice that they are there. I have never once clicked on one of them. I would be unable to name a single service or product that I have seen advertised in connection with services provided by Google. I may have unknowingly bought one or two of them but if I did, it was not because of an ad I saw. I would have bought it anyway.
So what are those advertisers paying for and why do they pay? I realize, of course, that they would not be happy to pay Google if everybody else acted like me. No doubt that many people do but it must be worth the advertisers’ while as long as there is a critical mass of Google users that do let their choices be effected by those targeted ads.
But strictly speaking, the advertisers must be paying for the access to all Google users’ screens, even mine. It is up to them whether or not they manage to convince the user to conduct a buy. In my case it would be hopeless but the advertiser does not know it when they decide to advertise in Google.
So, since it is the access to my screen that brings in the revenue, how about Google sharing a dime of those record profits? Without the users the G would not earn a cent. So how come we, the users, do not get a cent of that revenue?
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
You enjoy living a slow, fulfilling life. You enjoy living every moment, no matter how ordinary.



