Crazy Norwegians

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 14:59 | Posted in Alcohol, beer | Leave a comment

Knut Albert advices that some Nowegian pubs ask as much as 10 € for a 0,5 liter portion of lager beer. And strange as it may sound, most people are happy to pay. A beer lover’s nightmare!

One would think that with a beer price like that Norway would be bound to be on the door step of a revolution. Either that or people must have a well developed culture of brewing their beer at home. Asking 10 € for a beer may be smart business but paying such a price is just crazy.

Happy “syttende mai”

Saturday, May 17, 2008 at 18:32 | Posted in History | 1 Comment

“Syttende mai” is Norwegian for the date of today 17th May. The Norwegian constitution was adopted on 17th May 1814 in Eidsvoll and the date is celebrated as the Norwegian national day.

I wrote an article about the historical background and my personal experience on celebrating the event for six years ago (in Swedish here). Please note that the comment links in my old site no longer work so if you want to post a comment, please do so here at the blog.

I wish a happy “syttende mai” to everybody who knows what it means, especially to somebody in Stavanger and Oslo. :-.)


Saturday, March 24, 2007 at 6:49 | Posted in it, Not serious, youtube | 7 Comments

This Norwegian video (with subtitles in English) features a medieval helpdesk. It was judged by as the funniest tech video in YouTube. It was aired by the Norwegian TV in 2001.


A private blog

Monday, February 19, 2007 at 19:50 | Posted in Blogosphere, Journalism, Personal, privacy | 4 Comments

A lot of bloggers say that their blog is private. Many of them say that they do not need to consider what is apppropriate to write in their blog because the blog is private. But what sort of a blog is private?

I do not have much of a problem with that sort of considerations. Anything I publish under the public domain is written under same proffessional considerations as I would apply when writing for a printed paper or a main stream web media. In my blogs I apply exactly the same journalistic ethical standards as I do when writing for a main stream publication.

The difference is that in a paper an editor would be legally responsible but in my blogs I am the responsible editor. Also, since the blogs are mine, I take more of a liberty to express my personal opinion. But just as in a paper, if I am mediating news, I stick to facts. In a column I could express personal views. Of course most of my blog posts are columns in that context and reflect my opinions, not anybody else’s.

Another question frequently asked by bloggers is how much information they can publish about other persons without their consent. The Estonian parliament recently adopted a law regulating personal data. The law does not specify a media (i.e. print, air or web) in saying that personal information can be published without the subject’s consent if there is a public interest for publishing it. I like that definition.

Last June I published personal information about Sweden’s then Prime Minister Göran Persson who was a crime suspect at the time. There is no doubt that scrutanizing his failure to comply with a law which he as a politician had been an active author of was in the public interest. The same mishap could have happened to any honest house owner, but a prime minister stumbling on the very bureaucracy he has participated in creating is something of a public interest.

On the other hand, if I were to hear a domestic fight at my neighbour’s flat through the paper thin walls, there would be no public interest to expose my neighbours. I might mention the fight but I would not publish their names, nor anything else that would make them easy to recognize. That would be unethical, possibly also illegal.

Not every blogger is a journalist and I suppose a non journalist blogger could say that they do not need to consider the journalistic ethics. But a teacher or a physician should definitely consider his or her proffessional ethics while blogging. A secondary school teacher in Øvre Romerike outside Oslo in Norway may have published something in his blog which contradicts the ethical standards of a teacher.

The teacher is said to have published personal details of his pupils in his blog. According to some information, some of the published details would even be covered by official confidentiality. He is not formally suspended but as long as the inquiry is going on, he is not allowed to teach. There is a chance he will be fired. A union lawyer from Oslo has travelled to town to assist him.

The case of this Norwegian teacher illustrates that some bloggers do not understand the difference between private and public. In addition to my several blogs accessable by anybody in the public domain I also have a number of private blogs, as in real private. They are being hosted in my server and protected by a robot.txt file and passwords. I share some of those blogs with a few selected friends but there are one or two with access for myself only.

Any blog which is accessable by any web user and searchable by search engines is not private although the blog’s author may think so. Anything that has been published in the public domain is indeed public. And you should by all means think twice about what sort of information you want to make public.


Geirsan in his blog and in a comment to my post

Verdens Gang

Romerikes Blad

Intimidating Norwegian blogger failed

Monday, February 19, 2007 at 4:21 | Posted in Bloggers' rights, Blogosphere, censorship, Freedom of speech | 4 Comments
Tags: ,

The Norwegian blogger Jarle Bergersen wrote in December about the marketing procedures and especially some cold calls he had received from persons trying to promote the services of He wrote that their telephone marketing was less than serious and the persons calling him did not have adequate knowledge of the services they were promoting. Nettkatalogen had an odd way to react to Bjarne’s post: they had their lawyer write a letter to Bjarne’s boss.

Bjarne Jarle works for Trygg og Sikker, a Norwegian company marketing various security devices. He had received the cold calls from Nettkatalogen in his capacity as an employee in the marketing department of Trygg og Sikker but he posted his critical remarks in his private blog. So why did Nettkatalogen choose to have their lawyer Peter L. Brechan from Haavind Vislie legal firm to write to his boss at Trygg og Sikker?

Bjarne Jarle thinks they were trying to intimidate him to removing the post through his employer:

Det kan virke som om Nettkatalogen har fått det for seg at de kan true vekk innhold på nett. I dette tilfellet forsøker de altså å bruke min arbeidsgiver til å presse meg til å fjerne innhold i bloggen min de ikke setter pris på. Det ville kanskje ha fungert hvis jeg stod mindre sterkt i den jobben jeg har. Jeg kan spesielt se for meg problemer hvis jeg skulle ha vært så uheldig å ha en litt “dårlig” sjef og en jobb i et stort multinasjonalt selskap som ikke ønsker mye “bølger”.

Luckily for Bjarne Jarle, he seems to have a good relationship with his boss and his position in the company is steady enough so this attempted intimidation did not work. Things certainly could have gone much worse for him.

Thanks to Geirsan for bringing the incident to my attention.

Create a free website or blog at
Entries and comments feeds.